Quick Answer
Love is related to emotion but is not simply an emotion. Emotions are episodes that come and go; love is an attitude or disposition that persists across episodes, involves evaluations of the beloved, and expresses itself in commitments and actions. Many philosophers treat love as more like a stance than a feeling.
Key Takeaways
- ✦Emotions are episodes; love is a lasting disposition, so it is not simply an emotion.
- ✦Cognitive theories treat emotions as involving judgments, which helps explain love's rationality.
- ✦Nussbaum treats love as an emotion-like response to the beloved's importance.
- ✦Love also includes commitment and practice, which pure emotion cannot capture.
- ✦This discussion is philosophical and educational, not therapeutic.
Is Love an Emotion?
Quick Answer
The short answer is: love is intimately connected with emotion, but it is not simply an emotion. Emotions are typically episodes — a flash of anger, a wave of fear — that begin, peak, and fade. Love, by contrast, persists through long stretches when no love-feeling is present. You can love someone while sleeping, working, or arguing with them. This suggests love is more like a disposition or attitude than an occurrent emotion.
But the question is subtler than it looks, because philosophers disagree about what emotions are. If emotions are judgments about what matters, then love may be an emotion-like state after all. The answer depends on the theory of emotion one adopts.
Historical Background
The philosophy of emotion distinguishes several components: feelings, physiological changes, expressions, judgments, and motivations. An episode of joy involves feeling good, a characteristic expression, and typically a judgment that something good has happened. Different theories privilege different components.
Feeling theories treat emotions as distinctive kinds of felt experience. On this view, love-as-emotion would be the feeling of love. But the feeling of love is not the whole of love: it can be absent when love is present, and it can be present in infatuation when deep love is absent.
Cognitive theories treat emotions as involving judgments or appraisals. On this view, to be angry is at least partly to judge that one has been wronged. Love, on a cognitive account, involves the judgment that the beloved is valuable and important. This makes love assessable: it can be accurate or mistaken, wise or foolish.
What Is Love?
Three features push love beyond the category of emotion. First, persistence: love endures while emotions come and go. Second, commitment: love typically involves intentions to act, to stay, to care — and intentions are not emotions. Third, history: love has a history with a particular person, built from shared experiences, and this history shapes what love now is.
This is why philosophers from Plato to the present have treated love as an attitude toward a person — a way of seeing, valuing, and being oriented toward their good — rather than as a feeling. Spinoza defined love as joy accompanied by the idea of an external cause, but he also treated it as a disposition of the mind. Nussbaum, in Upheavals of Thought, argues that love is an emotion in her extended sense: a response to the beloved's importance that involves evaluative judgments and reshapes the lover's world.
Key Arguments
The argument for love-as-emotion: love involves the same components as emotions — intense feelings, bodily responses, and evaluations of a person — and it can be overwhelming in the same way. Nussbaum's account treats emotions as "geological upheavals" of the self, and love fits this description.
The argument against: love lacks the episodic structure of emotion and includes elements emotions lack. A commitment to care for someone through illness, decline, or difficulty is not a feeling, and it can survive when all love-feelings are exhausted. The concept of love must include these elements, so love is best understood as a complex state with emotional, evaluative, and practical dimensions.
Contemporary Relevance
The question matters practically. If love is only a feeling, then love ends when the feeling fades — and much of modern culture teaches this. If love is also a judgment and a commitment, then love can be examined, sustained, repaired, and chosen. The philosophical view restores agency to love: we are not merely passive in it.
This page offers philosophical and educational reflection. It is not counseling or psychological advice; readers navigating difficult relationships should seek qualified professionals.
Sources
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Emotion".
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Love".
- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Theories of Emotion".
- Martha C. Nussbaum, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Related Topics
This page sits at the intersection of two questions. See What Is Emotion? for the general theory, and What Is Love? for love's many forms. The Philosophy of Emotion hub and the Love, Emotion & Connection collection connect the philosophical and relational threads.
Continue Learning
Knowledge NetworkDeep Dive
Explore related concepts
- answer
Can AI Love?
Related through Philosophy Of Emotion
- topic
Emotion: The Philosophy of Feeling
Related through Philosophy Of Emotion
- collection
Love, Emotion & Connection: The Philosophy of Love, Emotions & Belonging
Related through Philosophy Of Emotion
- book
Upheavals of Thought by Martha Nussbaum
Related through Philosophy Of Emotion
- answer
What Is Emotion?
Related through Philosophy Of Emotion
- philosophy
Philosophy of Emotion
Related through Philosophy Of Mind
- answer
What Is Romantic Love?
Related through Philosophy Of Love
- topic
Mind
Related through Philosophy Of Mind
Archive references
Sources
- 01EmotionBy Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyConsult source
- 02LoveBy Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyConsult source
- 03Theories of EmotionBy Internet Encyclopedia of PhilosophyConsult source
- 04Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of EmotionsBy Martha C. NussbaumCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
ZHAIBIAN Editorial Board reviewed
Reviewed by ZHAIBIAN AI Editorial Review · 2026-08-20