Quick Answer
Agape is self-giving, unconditional love — love that is not based on the beloved's attractiveness, merits, or response. In Christian philosophy it is the love of God for humanity and the model for human love of neighbor. Kierkegaard argues that agape is a duty, commanded, and therefore the same toward everyone.
Key Takeaways
- ✦Agape is self-giving love that does not depend on the beloved's merits.
- ✦In Christian philosophy, agape is the love of God and the model for neighbor-love.
- ✦Kierkegaard treats neighbor-love as a duty that must not be partial.
- ✦Agape differs from eros (desiring love) and philia (friendship).
- ✦This page is educational and philosophical, not religious or clinical advice.
What Is Agape?
Quick Answer
Agape is self-giving love that is not conditioned on the beloved's worth, attractiveness, or response. It is the love that gives without demanding return and that extends even to the undeserving. In Christian philosophy, agape is the love of God for humanity, and the standard for human love of neighbor.
The word was relatively rare in classical Greek, where eros and philia dominated; it was the New Testament and early Christian writers who made agape central. Since then, philosophers and theologians have debated what agape requires of human beings and how it relates to the loves we naturally feel.
What Is Agape?
Agape has three defining features. First, it is unconditional: it does not depend on the beloved's qualities or behavior. Second, it is self-giving: it seeks the beloved's good, often at cost to oneself. Third, it is universal in scope: it extends to all persons, including enemies and strangers.
This is why agape is often described as love that "creates" value rather than responding to it. The beloved is not loved because they are lovable; they are made to feel loved, and in that love their dignity is affirmed.
Historical Background
The Christian tradition built its ethics of love on agape. Augustine synthesized the biblical teaching with Platonic philosophy: all love is a movement toward the good, and the ordering of love (ordo amoris) is the task of the moral life. God's love is the model — gracious, undeserved, faithful.
Kierkegaard's Works of Love gives agape its most rigorous philosophical expression. For Kierkegaard, the command to "love your neighbor as yourself" is precisely what makes love ethical rather than preferential. Natural love — erotic love, friendship — is based on preference for the attractive or similar. Agape is commanded, and a commanded love cannot depend on inclination: it must be the same toward everyone, and it must be practiced in works, not just felt.
C. S. Lewis popularized the taxonomy for modern readers in The Four Loves: eros and philia are natural loves, admirable but conditional; charity (agape) is the love that can perfect and preserve them. Simone Weil developed a related but more austere account, treating love of neighbor as attention to the reality of the other.
Key Arguments
The case for agape as an ethical ideal is powerful. It secures the dignity of every person regardless of merit, and it forbids the instrumentalization of others. It is the philosophical backbone of the idea that every human being deserves respect and care.
The objections are equally serious. First, can human beings love what they cannot approve of or even like? Second, does agape conflict with justice — must we love the wrongdoer as much as the victim? Third, does unconditional love undermine self-respect or enable harm? Kierkegaard's answer is that agape is a duty precisely because it is difficult; it is the love that does not depend on the beloved being lovable. Lewis adds that agape does not replace the natural loves but orders them.
Contemporary Relevance
Agape remains influential in ethics, political thought, and discussions of compassion and care. It underlies ideas of human dignity, universal respect, and the ethics of attention. It also connects to Buddhist loving-kindness, which extends goodwill to all beings without distinction. Understanding agape helps clarify what unconditional love means and what it does not require.
This page is educational and philosophical. It is not religious instruction or psychological advice.
Sources
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Love".
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Kierkegaard".
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Saint Augustine".
- Søren Kierkegaard, Works of Love, trans. Howard and Edna Hong (Princeton University Press, 1995).
- C. S. Lewis, The Four Loves (Geoffrey Bles, 1960).
Related Topics
Agape is best understood in contrast with the other loves. See What Is Eros? and Eros vs Agape for the classic contrast, and What Is Unconditional Love? for the modern idea. The Philosophy of Love hub and the Love, Emotion & Connection collection trace these themes.
Continue Learning
Knowledge NetworkDeep Dive
Explore related concepts
- answer
What Is Unconditional Love?
Related through Philosophy Of Love
- book
Works of Love by Søren Kierkegaard
Related through Philosophy Of Love
- topic
Compassion
Related through Buddhism
- collection
Love, Emotion & Connection: The Philosophy of Love, Emotions & Belonging
Related through Philosophy Of Love
- thinker
Simone Weil: Attention, Love & Affliction
Related through Philosophy Of Love
- answer
What Is Compassion?
Related through Buddhism
- answer
Eros vs Agape — Two Faces of Love
Related through agape
- book
The Four Loves
Related through love
Archive references
Sources
- 01LoveBy Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyConsult source
- 02KierkegaardBy Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyConsult source
- 03Saint AugustineBy Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyConsult source
- 04Works of LoveBy Søren Kierkegaard; translated by Howard and Edna HongPrinceton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
- 05The Four LovesBy C. S. LewisLondon: Geoffrey Bles, 1960.
ZHAIBIAN Editorial Board reviewed
Reviewed by ZHAIBIAN AI Editorial Review · 2026-08-20