Skip to content

Classic Library

Fear and Trembling

Søren Kierkegaard's 1843 pseudonymous meditation on Abraham, faith, ethical obligation, and the demanding character of individual religious existence.

Author

Søren Kierkegaard

Library record

Historical period

Ancient text

Frygt og Bæven

Tradition

kierkegaard

ZHAIBIAN Classic Library

Known for

existentialism · faith · ethics · abraham

Zhaibian LibraryFear and TremblingSøren Kierkegaard

Library record

Author

Søren Kierkegaard

Written period

Ancient text

Original title

Frygt og Bæven

Genre

Classical philosophy

Related philosophy

See archive relations

Concept index

Key Ideas

IDEA 01

kierkegaard

IDEA 02

existentialism

IDEA 03

faith

IDEA 04

ethics

IDEA 05

abraham

Reading archive

Important Passages

Passages are preserved with their source context. Consult the Markdown section below for book and chapter guidance before treating any translation as a standalone quotation.

Author relationship

In the archive

Library navigation

Knowledge Path

Book

Fear and Trembling

Philosophy

Wisdom Concepts

Quotation archive

Quotes From This Book

Overview

Fear and Trembling was published in 1843 under the pseudonym Johannes de Silentio. In it, Søren Kierkegaard returns repeatedly to the biblical account of Abraham being commanded to sacrifice Isaac. The book does not retell the narrative in order to provide an uncomplicated moral example. It uses Abraham's situation to examine the difficult relation among faith, ethical obligation, inwardness, and public intelligibility.

The work is a philosophical and literary meditation rather than a systematic theological treatise. Its narrator admits that he cannot understand Abraham as a “knight of faith,” and the book's indirect form is integral to its argument. Readers should therefore distinguish the pseudonymous author's voice from a simple statement of Kierkegaard's own doctrine.

Author

Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855) was a Danish writer, theologian, and philosopher whose works investigate subjective existence, choice, anxiety, despair, and faith. He published many major works under pseudonyms, allowing contrasting existential positions to be explored without reducing them to direct authorial pronouncements.

Johannes de Silentio—the named author of Fear and Trembling—is one such pseudonym. His claimed inability to comprehend Abraham creates an important distance between narrator, reader, and subject matter. The book is best read within Kierkegaard's wider practice of indirect communication.

Historical Background

The book appeared in Copenhagen during a remarkable period of Kierkegaard's authorship. In 1843 he also published Either/Or, Repetition, Three Upbuilding Discourses, and other works. Nineteenth-century Danish religious life was shaped by the established Lutheran church, while European intellectual culture was strongly influenced by post-Kantian philosophy, especially Hegelian accounts of ethics, history, and universality.

Kierkegaard's treatment of Abraham speaks into these contexts. He asks whether a religious relation to God can be comprehended within ordinary ethical categories and whether the person of faith can be fully understood from the standpoint of public reason. These questions must not be detached from the book's literary and biblical setting.

Faith and Existential Choice

Fear and Trembling describes faith as a demanding personal relation rather than a social habit or a conclusion reached by detached speculation. Abraham's ordeal is presented as a paradox: he is both a father bound by ethical responsibility and a person who understands himself as commanded by God. The work investigates the anguish and isolation that arise when a person's deepest commitment cannot be transparently justified to others.

This does not make the book a general permission to disregard moral duties in the name of private conviction. Johannes de Silentio treats Abraham as exceptional and repeatedly stresses that the story is terrifying. The text's force lies in making readers confront the difference between admiring faith from a distance and understanding what it would demand of an existing individual.

The Individual and the Absolute

One of the work's most discussed formulations is the “teleological suspension of the ethical.” In the book's argument, the ethical is associated with the universal—the sphere in which actions can be explained and judged by shared standards. Abraham appears to stand in an absolute relation to God that cannot be mediated by that universal framework.

The phrase is controversial and must be interpreted carefully. It describes a paradox internal to the book's reading of Abraham, not a transferable ethical method. The text also contrasts the “tragic hero,” whose sacrifice can be understood within ethical terms, with Abraham, whose action cannot be made publicly intelligible in the same way. Its concern is the limit of explanation in religious existence, not an escape from accountability.

Core Ideas

The book develops several recurring ideas: the difference between resignation and faith; the tension between the individual and the universal; the significance of inwardness; and the relation between finite loss and hope. The figure of the “knight of infinite resignation” gives up what is most precious in an inner movement. The “knight of faith,” as the narrator portrays him, makes that movement and yet believes that the finite can be received again “by virtue of the absurd.”

These figures are philosophical-literary constructions, not personality types for casual self-description. They give form to questions about commitment, grief, ethical communication, and what religious faith claims in the face of impossibility. The book resists a final explanatory formula, which is part of why it has remained central to discussions of existential thought.

Key Ideas

The book's key ideas are indirect communication, faith as a paradoxical existential commitment, the distinction between ethical universality and Abraham's singular case, and the difference between infinite resignation and the narrator's ideal of faith. Each is developed through a literary reading of a specific biblical story rather than offered as a general instruction for private action.

Influence

Fear and Trembling became a major text for twentieth-century theology, existential philosophy, ethics, and literary criticism. It has been read by thinkers concerned with the limits of moral theory and with the role of singular commitment in human life. Its legacy includes sharply conflicting interpretations: some readers emphasize radical faith, while others challenge the ethical risks of placing any claim beyond public scrutiny.

The book's connection to existentialism lies in its attention to the existing individual, anxiety, responsibility, and meaning. Yet it should not be treated as a generic handbook of personal choice. Its argument depends on a particular religious narrative and on Kierkegaard's use of pseudonymous, indirect writing.

Sources

  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “Søren Kierkegaard.”
  • Søren Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling / Repetition, trans. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong, Princeton University Press.
  • Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “Søren Kierkegaard.”

Learning Path

Part of a Structured Collection

Knowledge Network

Archive references

Sources

3 scholarly sources
  • 01
    Søren KierkegaardBy Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyConsult source
  • 02
    Fear and Trembling / RepetitionBy Søren Kierkegaard, translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. HongConsult source
  • 03
    Søren KierkegaardBy Internet Encyclopedia of PhilosophyConsult source

ZHAIBIAN Editorial Board reviewed

Reviewed by ZHAIBIAN AI Editorial Review · 2026-07-22

Based on 3 scholarly sourcesLast updated 2026-07-22