Skip to content

Classic Library

The Coloniality of Gender

María Lugones argues that colonial domination imposed a racialized modern gender system rather than simply exporting a preexisting universal relation…

Author

María Lugones

Library record

Historical period

Ancient text

Original title unavailable

Tradition

feminist philosophy

ZHAIBIAN Classic Library

Known for

coloniality · gender

Zhaibian LibraryThe Coloniality of GenderMaría Lugones

Library record

Author

María Lugones

Written period

Ancient text

Original title

See source editions

Genre

Classical philosophy

Related philosophy

Decolonial Feminism

Concept index

Key Ideas

IDEA 01

feminist philosophy

IDEA 02

coloniality

IDEA 03

gender

Reading archive

Important Passages

Passages are preserved with their source context. Consult the Markdown section below for book and chapter guidance before treating any translation as a standalone quotation.

Author relationship

In the archive

Library navigation

Knowledge Path

Book

The Coloniality of Gender

Wisdom Concepts

No published record

Quotation archive

Quotes From This Book

Overview

Published in 2007, The Coloniality of Gender by María Lugones addresses a defined problem in feminist thought. María Lugones argues that colonial domination imposed a racialized modern gender system rather than simply exporting a preexisting universal relation between men and women.

The essay joins decolonial analysis with women-of-color feminism and challenges categories that separate race, gender, and coloniality.

Author and Historical Background

The work belongs to the debates of 2007; its examples and vocabulary should be interpreted in that setting. María Lugones intervenes not simply by describing inequality but by identifying a process through which authority, labor, knowledge, bodies, or relationships are organized. Later readers should distinguish that original target from broader claims subsequently attached to the title.

Key Ideas

María Lugones argues that colonial domination imposed a racialized modern gender system rather than simply exporting a preexisting universal relation between men and women. The key analytical move is visible in the book’s own subject matter: The Coloniality of Gender changes which facts count as politically or philosophically relevant. The essay joins decolonial analysis with women-of-color feminism and challenges categories that separate race, gender, and coloniality.

Reading Method

The evidence route for The Coloniality of Gender begins with The Coloniality of Gender and Feminist Philosophy. The query “the coloniality of gender” remains distinct from Equality Feminism Vs Difference Feminism and Essentialism Vs Social Construction Of Gender, which tests a neighboring mechanism rather than repeating this page.

Influence and Criticism

Scholars debate the historical scope of the claim and the risk of underdescribing gendered hierarchy in precolonial societies.

That objection identifies the book’s scope rather than automatically defeating it. A strong assessment asks whether the disputed premise is essential, whether later evidence supports it, and which subsequent thinkers revise the framework. The continued value of The Coloniality of Gender lies in the specific questions it made harder to ignore.

Sources

On The Coloniality of Gender, the controlling intent is “the coloniality of gender.” The Coloniality of Gender and Feminist Philosophy establish the documentary frame, whereas Equality Feminism Vs Difference Feminism and Essentialism Vs Social Construction Of Gender mark the closest points of contrast or application.

Related entities were selected to illuminate María Lugones’s argument, its intellectual neighbors, or its strongest criticism. Relation does not imply agreement.

Knowledge Network

Archive references

Sources

2 scholarly sources
  • 01
    The Coloniality of GenderBy María LugonesOpen-access publisher record for María Lugones's The Coloniality of Gender.Consult source
  • 02
    Feminist PhilosophyStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy field context.Consult source

Source and quality checks completed

Quality check completed 2026-08-25

Based on 2 scholarly sourcesLast updated 2026-08-25