Library record
Author
Neil Postman
Written period
1995
Original title
See source editions
Genre
Classical philosophy
Related philosophy
See archive relations
Concept index
Key Ideas
IDEA 01
Neil Postman
IDEA 02
purpose of education
IDEA 03
technology
IDEA 04
public school
Reading archive
Important Passages
Passages are preserved with their source context. Consult the Markdown section below for book and chapter guidance before treating any translation as a standalone quotation.
Author relationship
In the archive
Overview
The End of Education is first published in 1995. Neil Postman's End of Education explained through sustaining narratives, public schooling, technology, consumerism, democracy, diversity, influence, and criticism. This guide treats the book as an argument situated in a particular intellectual setting, not as a collection of detachable slogans.
Author Context
In The End of Education, Neil Postman approaches the subject through concerns associated with Neil Postman, purpose of education, technology, public school. The author’s wider intellectual commitments help explain both the book’s priorities and its blind spots. Readers should distinguish the claims made in this work from later interpretations that use its title as shorthand for an entire movement.
Historical Background
The End of Education emerged amid debates connected with Philosophy Of Education Learning And Human Development, Aims Of Education, Education Technology And Ai. Its historical significance depends on the problems its first readers recognized, the vocabulary available at the time, and the institutions through which the argument circulated. Penguin Random House, The End of Education; Encyclopaedia Britannica, Neil Postman anchors the edition and contextual information used for this record.
Core Ideas
The central ideas of The End of Education can be reconstructed by asking what problem Neil Postman identifies, which concepts organize the response, and what evidence or reasoning supports it. In this book those questions converge around Neil Postman, purpose of education, technology, public school. That reconstruction is more reliable than reducing the work to a single moral or memorable phrase.
Key Themes
The principal themes of The End of Education include Neil Postman, purpose of education, technology, public school. They should be read as connected parts of the book’s argument: a change in one assumption may alter the meaning of the others. Comparison with Philosophy Of Education Learning And Human Development, Aims Of Education, Education Technology And Ai reveals where the text agrees with, revises, or resists neighboring positions.
Philosophical Meaning
The philosophical importance of The End of Education lies in the questions it makes difficult to ignore. It invites readers to examine definitions, reasons, consequences, and the relation between individual judgment and wider practices. Its claims remain open to criticism, especially where historical assumptions no longer match contemporary evidence.
Influence
The influence of The End of Education is best measured through the debates, practices, and later works that respond to it rather than through reputation alone. Use Penguin Random House, The End of Education; Encyclopaedia Britannica, Neil Postman to verify the text, then follow the archive relations to compare reception and criticism. This preserves the difference between explaining a book’s influence and endorsing every conclusion it contains.
Learning Path
Part of a Structured Collection
Continue Learning
Knowledge NetworkNext Step
Continue your learning path
- topic
Aims of Education: Knowledge, Freedom and Flourishing
Direct archive relation
- topic
Education Technology and AI: Learning, Power and Responsibility
Direct archive relation
- thinker
Gert Biesta
Related through purpose of education
- answer
What Is the Purpose of Education?
Related through purpose of education
Deep Dive
Explore related concepts
Compare Perspectives
See how different thinkers approach this
Archive references
Sources
- 01
- 02Neil PostmanBy Encyclopaedia BritannicaConsult source
Source and quality checks completed
Quality check completed 2026-08-24