Skip to content

Classic Library

The Uses of the University

Clark Kerr's Uses of the University explained through the multiversity, teaching, research, public service, governance, knowledge economy, influence, and criticism.

Author

Clark Kerr

Library record

Historical period

1963 CE

Original title unavailable

Tradition

Clark Kerr

ZHAIBIAN Classic Library

Known for

multiversity · higher education · university

Zhaibian LibraryThe Uses of the UniversityClark Kerr

Library record

Author

Clark Kerr

Written period

1963

Original title

See source editions

Genre

Classical philosophy

Related philosophy

See archive relations

Concept index

Key Ideas

IDEA 01

Clark Kerr

IDEA 02

multiversity

IDEA 03

higher education

IDEA 04

university

Reading archive

Important Passages

Passages are preserved with their source context. Consult the Markdown section below for book and chapter guidance before treating any translation as a standalone quotation.

Overview

The Uses of the University is Clark Kerr’s analysis of the modern research university as a “multiversity”: not one coherent community with a single end, but a large institution serving teaching, research, government, industry, professions, regions, and many internal constituencies.

Author and Context

Kerr delivered the original Godkin Lectures in 1963 while president of the University of California. Mass enrollment, federal research funding, the Cold War, and economic demand for expertise were transforming U.S. higher education.

Central Argument

The modern university cannot be understood through an ideal of a small residential community alone. Its multiple purposes and power centers must be governed rather than wished away. Knowledge has become a central economic resource, drawing universities into extensive external relationships.

Key Ideas

The multiversity is plural, administratively complex, and held together through negotiated interests. Teaching and research coexist with service, credentialing, and regional development. The university president becomes mediator among constituencies rather than sole intellectual leader.

Why It Matters

Kerr’s descriptive realism became a standard reference for higher-education studies. Critics argue that it normalizes bureaucracy, corporate influence, military research, and fragmentation rather than defending a normative purpose. The book’s value is diagnostic: before reformers announce what a university ought to be, they must understand the institutions, incentives, and dependencies it has become.

Knowledge Network

Archive references

Sources

2 scholarly sources

ZHAIBIAN Editorial Board reviewed

Reviewed by ZHAIBIAN AI Editorial Review · 2026-08-24

Based on 2 scholarly sourcesLast updated 2026-08-24