Quotation archive
“the right of everyone to an adequate standard of living for himself and his family, including adequate food, clothing and housing”
United Nations · International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Quote record
Author
United Nations
Source
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Chapter / location
Article 11(1), quoted in CESCR General Comment No. 4, paragraph 1
Tradition
urban-ethics · housing-affordability-rent-and-displacement · housing-justice-ethics
Source information
From International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Article 11(1), quoted in CESCR General Comment No. 4, paragraph 1.
Translation
English translation; consult the named source edition for the original wording.
Context
Read the contextual commentary in this archive entry.
Interpretation
United Nations on Adequate Housing: verified evidence, objections, practical limits, and related urban ideas in a clear guide for careful research and comparison.
Historical Context
United Nations on Adequate Housing presents a short excerpt by United Nations from International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, located at Article 11(1), quoted in CESCR General Comment No. 4, paragraph 1. The wording is reproduced only in the verified form recorded above. Its date, document type, and surrounding argument matter: this is evidence of what the speaker or institution said, not proof that the urban aspiration described has been achieved.
Meaning
The excerpt's central idea is “the right of everyone to an adequate standard of living for himself and his family, including adequate food, clothing and housing”. In the context of United Nations on Adequate Housing, the wording directs attention to who can create, inhabit, access, or transform urban life. The interpretation should remain close to the quoted terms and should not silently convert a political vision, scholarly argument, or institutional target into a universal legal rule.
Philosophical Interpretation
United Nations on Adequate Housing can be read through democratic participation, rights, capabilities, and spatial justice. The passage asks readers to connect city form with human agency and unequal power, while General Comment No. 4: The Right to Adequate Housing and New Urban Agenda supply an institutional comparison. Its philosophical value lies in framing a problem for judgment; the excerpt cannot replace evidence about present conditions.
Interpretive Limit
The controlling boundary for United Nations on Adequate Housing is preserve 1966 wording; explain broader adequate-housing elements. This qualification prevents the excerpt from being used as a free-floating slogan. Readers should consult the named work, preserve the edition or paragraph location, and distinguish interpretation from attribution before carrying the quotation into another debate.
Learning Path
Part of a Structured Collection
Continue Learning
Knowledge NetworkNext Step
Continue your learning path
- answer
Are Fifteen Minute Cities Restrictive?
Related through Housing Justice Ethics
- answer
Can Green Space Cause Displacement?
Related through Housing Justice Ethics
- answer
Community Land Trust vs Public Housing?
Related through Housing Justice Ethics
- answer
Does Rent Control Work?
Related through Housing Justice Ethics
- topic
Homelessness Dignity and Public Duty
Related through Housing Justice Ethics
- topic
Housing Affordability Rent and Displacement
Related through Housing Justice Ethics
- answer
Housing Affordability vs Housing Availability?
Related through Housing Justice Ethics
- answer
Housing as a Right vs Housing as an Investment?
Related through Housing Justice Ethics
Archive references
Sources
- 01General Comment No. 4: The Right to Adequate HousingBy UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural RightsConsult source
- 02New Urban AgendaBy United Nations Human Settlements ProgrammeConsult source
- 03World Cities ReportBy United Nations Human Settlements ProgrammeConsult source
Source and quality checks completed
Quality check completed 2026-08-26