Skip to content

Thinker Archive

Claudia Card

American philosopher whose work transformed feminist ethics, theories of evil, lesbian philosophy, and analysis of atrocity. Explore key ideas, major works,…

Period

Historical figure

Identity

Thinker

Philosophical archive record

Known for

feminist-philosophy · claudia · card

Archive navigation

Knowledge Path

Thinker

Claudia Card

Philosophy

No published record

Wisdom Concepts

No published record

Biography

Claudia Card (1940–2015) was american philosopher whose work transformed feminist ethics, theories of evil, lesbian philosophy, and analysis of atrocity.

On Claudia Card, the controlling intent is “claudia card.” Reference profile: Claudia Card and Feminist Philosophy establish the documentary frame, whereas Sexual Politics and The Dialectic Of Sex mark the closest points of contrast or application.

Historical Context

American philosopher whose work transformed feminist ethics, theories of evil, lesbian philosophy, and analysis of atrocity. The dates and named works place the intervention within identifiable movements and disputes. Present terminology should not be projected onto that setting without explaining what changed.

Core Ideas

Card’s atrocity paradigm defines evils through intolerable harm plus culpable wrongdoing, shifting attention from demonic motives to victims and social practices.

A reader researching “claudia card” should verify Claudia Card through Reference profile: Claudia Card and Feminist Philosophy. The relation to Sexual Politics and The Dialectic Of Sex is deliberately narrower: it opens a next question without importing that page’s answer.

Major Works

Read The Atrocity Paradigm, ** The Unnatural Lottery**, ** Confronting Evils** as distinct works with their own genres and arguments. A claim attributed to Claudia Card should be traceable to one of those texts or another named primary source, with edition and context supplied for direct quotations.

Interpretation and Influence

Card’s atrocity paradigm defines evils through intolerable harm plus culpable wrongdoing, shifting attention from demonic motives to victims and social practices. Later scholarship uses this intervention to ask new questions and also changes its vocabulary, evidence, and scope. Influence therefore includes disagreement, not only repetition.

Criticism

The threshold for “intolerable” harm and the relation between individual culpability and structural evil remain debated. Evaluate that challenge against the actual claim: determine whether it exposes a central premise, a historical limit, or a later misuse. That is more informative than accepting or rejecting the thinker as a whole.

Sources

The scope test for Claudia Card is whether the evidence directly addresses “claudia card.” Reference profile: Claudia Card and Feminist Philosophy support that test; Sexual Politics and The Dialectic Of Sex expose where a related concept may produce a different judgment.

Relations point to an intellectual neighbor, critic, or application of Claudia Card’s work. They are not claims of agreement.

Knowledge Network

Archive references

Sources

2 scholarly sources

Source and quality checks completed

Quality check completed 2026-08-25

Based on 2 scholarly sourcesLast updated 2026-08-25