Skip to content

Classic Library

Data Feminism

A philosophical guide to Data Feminism by D'Ignazio and Klein, exploring the seven principles of data feminism, power, and the justice of data science.

Author

Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren Klein

Library record

Historical period

2020 CE

Original title unavailable

Tradition

data feminism

ZHAIBIAN Classic Library

Known for

feminist-epistemology · data-justice · information-ethics · data-science · intersectionality

Zhaibian LibraryData FeminismCatherine D'Ignazio and Lauren Klein

Library record

Author

Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren Klein

Written period

2020

Original title

See source editions

Genre

Classical philosophy

Related philosophy

Feminist Epistemology · Information Ethics

Concept index

Key Ideas

IDEA 01

data feminism

IDEA 02

feminist epistemology

IDEA 03

data justice

IDEA 04

information ethics

IDEA 05

data science

IDEA 06

intersectionality

Reading archive

Important Passages

Passages are preserved with their source context. Consult the Markdown section below for book and chapter guidance before treating any translation as a standalone quotation.

Author relationship

In the archive

Library navigation

Knowledge Path

Book

Data Feminism

Author

No published record

Wisdom Concepts

No published record

Overview

Data Feminism is first published in 2020. A philosophical guide to Data Feminism by D'Ignazio and Klein, exploring the seven principles of data feminism, power, and the justice of data science. This guide treats the book as an argument situated in a particular intellectual setting, not as a collection of detachable slogans.

Author Context

In Data Feminism, Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren Klein approaches the subject through concerns associated with data-feminism, feminist-epistemology, data-justice, information-ethics, data-science. The author’s wider intellectual commitments help explain both the book’s priorities and its blind spots. Readers should distinguish the claims made in this work from later interpretations that use its title as shorthand for an entire movement.

Historical Background

Data Feminism emerged amid debates connected with Feminist Epistemology, Information Ethics. Its historical significance depends on the problems its first readers recognized, the vocabulary available at the time, and the institutions through which the argument circulated. Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren Klein (MIT Press, 2020), Data Feminism; MIT Press Open, Data Feminism (Open Access Edition) anchors the edition and contextual information used for this record.

Core Ideas

The central ideas of Data Feminism can be reconstructed by asking what problem Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren Klein identifies, which concepts organize the response, and what evidence or reasoning supports it. In this book those questions converge around data-feminism, feminist-epistemology, data-justice, information-ethics, data-science. That reconstruction is more reliable than reducing the work to a single moral or memorable phrase.

Key Themes

The principal themes of Data Feminism include data-feminism, feminist-epistemology, data-justice, information-ethics, data-science. They should be read as connected parts of the book’s argument: a change in one assumption may alter the meaning of the others. Comparison with Feminist Epistemology, Information Ethics reveals where the text agrees with, revises, or resists neighboring positions.

Philosophical Meaning

The philosophical importance of Data Feminism lies in the questions it makes difficult to ignore. It invites readers to examine definitions, reasons, consequences, and the relation between individual judgment and wider practices. Its claims remain open to criticism, especially where historical assumptions no longer match contemporary evidence.

Influence

The influence of Data Feminism is best measured through the debates, practices, and later works that respond to it rather than through reputation alone. Use Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren Klein (MIT Press, 2020), Data Feminism; MIT Press Open, Data Feminism (Open Access Edition) to verify the text, then follow the archive relations to compare reception and criticism. This preserves the difference between explaining a book’s influence and endorsing every conclusion it contains.

Knowledge Network

Archive references

Sources

2 scholarly sources
✓

Source and quality checks completed

Quality check completed 2026-08-17

◈Based on 2 scholarly sources◈Last updated 2026-08-17