Skip to content

Classic Library

Natural Right and History

A philosophical guide to Leo Strauss's Natural Right and History, examining his defense of classical natural right against modern relativism and historicism, and his critique of the modern political philosophy of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau.

Author

Leo Strauss

Library record

Historical period

Ancient text

Original title unavailable

Tradition

natural right and history

ZHAIBIAN Classic Library

Known for

leo-strauss · natural-right · political-philosophy · historicism · classical-philosophy

Zhaibian LibraryNatural Right and HistoryLeo Strauss

Library record

Author

Leo Strauss

Written period

Ancient text

Original title

See source editions

Genre

Classical philosophy

Related philosophy

See archive relations

Concept index

Key Ideas

IDEA 01

natural right and history

IDEA 02

leo strauss

IDEA 03

natural right

IDEA 04

political philosophy

IDEA 05

historicism

IDEA 06

classical philosophy

Reading archive

Important Passages

Passages are preserved with their source context. Consult the Markdown section below for book and chapter guidance before treating any translation as a standalone quotation.

Author relationship

In the archive

Library navigation

Knowledge Path

Overview

Natural Right and History, published in 1953 by Leo Strauss, is one of the most influential and controversial works of twentieth-century political philosophy. The book defends the classical tradition of natural right against the modern challenges of historicism, relativism, and positivism. Strauss argues that the modern rejection of natural right has led to a crisis of political philosophy — a loss of the capacity to distinguish between just and unjust regimes, or to provide a rational foundation for moral and political judgment.

The book is structured as a critical history of modern political philosophy. Strauss argues that the modern tradition, beginning with Machiavelli and Hobbes, rejected the classical understanding of natural right in favor of a new approach based on the mastery of nature and the satisfaction of the passions. This rejection, Strauss argues, has led to the relativism and nihilism that characterize modern political thought.

Key Ideas

Strauss's central argument is that the classical tradition of natural right, as developed by Plato and Aristotle, provides a more adequate foundation for political philosophy than the modern alternatives. Classical natural right is based on the idea that there is a natural order of the human good that can be rationally understood, and that the just society is one that conforms to this natural order. The modern tradition, by contrast, denies the existence of a rational standard of justice and reduces right to the expression of will, interest, or historical convention.

Influence

Natural Right and History has been enormously influential in the revival of interest in classical political philosophy and in the development of Straussian political theory. The book has also been the subject of extensive criticism, particularly from defenders of the modern tradition and from those who argue that Strauss's reading of the history of political philosophy is tendentious and selective.

Sources

  1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Leo Strauss." Comprehensive survey of Strauss's life and thought.
  2. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Natural Law." Survey of the natural law tradition that Strauss defends.
Knowledge Network

Archive references

Sources

2 scholarly sources
  • 01
    Leo StraussBy Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyConsult source
  • 02
    Natural Right and HistoryBy Leo StraussChicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.

ZHAIBIAN Editorial Board reviewed

Reviewed by ZHAIBIAN AI Editorial Review · 2026-08-10

Based on 2 scholarly sourcesLast updated 2026-08-10